Preprint / Version 1

Knowledge and Adherence to Social Distancing Guidelines in Nigeria

Authors

  • Ebidor Ufounamefe Lawani-Luwaji Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Niger Delta University
  • Pere-ere F.T Victor Department of Educational Foundation, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island
  • Dorcas Blesson Esene Department of Educational Foundation, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21467/preprints.97

Abstract

Social distancing refers to actions or steps taken by an individual or groups of individuals with the main purpose of reducing physical and social interaction to curb the spread of infectious disease. This study sought to determine Nigerians knowledge of social distancing and why most people do not adhere to the guidelines amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Data was generated from respondents who filled an online survey form distributed on all social media platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria. All respondents living in Nigeria were included in the study while those living outside at the time of the survey were excluded. Results from the survey revealed that most Nigerians are knowledgeable about social distancing guidelines but observed low or non-adherence to the rules. This non-compliance was partly attributed to poor knowledge of the guidelines due to inadequate information from the government, and majorly due to lack of basic amenities, poverty and hunger. Further research and policies on the best avenue of reaching this group of Nigerians with a substantial economic package, an improvement on information dissemination on social distancing guidelines will make a great difference. Finally, the authorities and policymakers can develop programmes to prepare citizen for the eventuality of a future pandemic.

Keywords:

Social Distancing, Adherence, Knowledge, COVID-19

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R, J Glass, L. M Glass, W.E Beyeler. and H. J Min, 2006. Targeted social distancing designs for pandemic influenza. Emerging infectious diseases, 12 (11), pp.1671.

J.S Horvath, M. McKinnon and L Roberts, 2006. The Australian response: pandemic influenza preparedness. Medical Journal of Australia, 185 (S10), pp.S35-S38.

National Health Services, U K, Guidance of social distancing

. [on-line] Available at: <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-guidance-on-social-distancing-and-for-vulnerable-people> [Accessed: 30/04/2020].

E.Teasdale, M Santer, A.W Geraghty, P. Little and L.Yardley, 2014. Public perceptions of non-pharmaceutical interventions for reducing transmission of respiratory infection: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies. BMC Public Health,14 (1), pp.589.

N.M Baum, P.D Jacobson and S, D Goold, 2009. “Listen to the people”: public deliberation about social distancing measures in a pandemic. The American Journal of Bioethics, [e-journal] 9 (11), pp.4-14.

J.K Kelso, G.J Milne and H. Kelly, 2009. Simulation suggests that rapid activation of social distancing can arrest epidemic development due to a novel strain of influenza. BMC public health, 9 (1), pp.117.

M.Q Patton, 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. [e-book] SAGE Publications, inc.

S. Lefever, M. Dal and A. Matthiasdottir, 2007. Online data collection in academic research: advantages and limitations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38 (4), pp.574-582.

Qualtrics, Determining sample size: how to make sure you get the correct sample size. [on-line] Available at: <https://www.qualtrics.com/experience-management/research/determine-sample-size/> [Accessed: 28th April 2020].

James Chen, 2019. Poverty. [on-line] Available at: <https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/poverty.asp> [Accessed: 05/12/2020].

Downloads

Posted

2020-06-04

Section

Coronavirus

Categories